When enabled in the kernel, EVL transparently controls the hardware timer chip via a proxy device, serving all timing requests including those originating from the in-band kernel logic. In order to maximize the timing accuracy, EVL needs to figure out the basic latency of the target platform.
Upon receipt from an interrupt, the time spent traversing the kernel code from the low-level entry code until the interrupt handler installed by some driver is invoked is shorter than the time that would be required for a kernel thread to resume on such event instead. It would take even more time for a user-space thread to resume, since this may entail changing the current memory address space, which may involve time-consuming MMU-related operations affecting the CPU caches.
This basic latency may be increased by multiple factors such as:
In order to deliver events as close as possible to the ideal time, EVL defines the notion of clock gravity, which is a set of static adjustment values to account for the basic latency of the target system for responding to timer events from any given clock device, as perceived by the client code waiting for these wake up events. For this reason, a clock gravity is defined as a triplet of values, which indicates the amount of time by which every timer shot should be anticipated from, depending on the target context it should activate, either IRQ handler, kernel or user thread.
When started with the
latmus runs a series of tests for
determining those best calibration values for the EVL core timer, then
tells the core to use them.
A typical output of this command looks like this:
Complete core timer calibration
# latmus -t == latmus started for core tuning, period=1000 us (may take a while) irq gravity...2000 ns kernel gravity...5000 ns user gravity...6500 ns == tuning completed after 34s
You might want to restrict the calibration process to specific
context(s), in which case you should pass the corresponding context
modifiers to the
latmus command, such as
-u for user-space and
-i for IRQ latency respectively:
# latmus -tui == latmus started for core tuning, period=1000 us (may take a while) irq gravity...1000 ns user gravity...6000 ns == tuning completed after 21s
You might get gravity triplets differing from a few microseconds between runs of the same calibration process: this is normal, and nothing to worry about provided all those values look close enough to the expected jitter on the target system. The reason for such discrepancies is that although latmus does run the same tests time and again, the conditions on the target system may be different between runs, leading to slightly varying results (e.g. variations in CPU cache performance for the calibration loop).